ESPN commentator Tim Bradley has offered a unique perspective on Shakur Stevenson’s recent performance against Edwin De Los Santos, suggesting an injury might have hindered Stevenson’s performance. In the fight, Stevenson claimed the vacant WBC lightweight title in a unanimous decision victory at the T-Mobile Arena in Las Vegas. Despite Stevenson’s lackluster display, which many saw as him merely running, Bradley interpreted this as sound defense, raising questions about his impartiality given Stevenson’s imminent departure from Top Rank.
Bradley refrained from confirming the injury but suggested it might be a factor in Stevenson’s conservative approach. Stevenson’s history of employing a cautious, pull-back style in fights against opponents like Jeremiah Nakathilia, Joet Gonzalez, and Robeisy Ramirez might contradict the injury theory, as it appears to be a consistent tactical choice in his career.
The commentator also expressed a desire to see Stevenson fight Gervonta Davis next, although he acknowledged the potential financial and stylistic challenges in making the fight happen. Bradley's support for Stevenson remains steadfast, despite acknowledging the fighter’s struggle in the De Los Santos bout and the likelihood of Top Rank not renewing his contract due to financial and marketability concerns.
Questions arise about the credibility of the injury claim and the impartiality of ESPN commentators like Bradley, who may be reluctant to criticize Stevenson, a prominent fighter on the network. Bradley’s comments reflect his belief in Stevenson’s skills, particularly his defensive prowess, which he views as crucial for winning championships. However, whether Stevenson’s performance was due to an injury or a tactical choice remains a topic of debate among boxing enthusiasts.
Image Credit: Top Rank